ROP (Return On Project): over-convoluted project workflow (‘I hate burocracy! I hate overhead!’) [1/7]

BureaucracyWhat’s ROP ? It’s a valuable concept for Project Managers, Change Managers and Business Analysts. “Return On Project” is all about efficiency and effectiveness: categorizing the most common causes of wasted resources in the life-cycle of a project, you will be able to reduce them and consequently improve ROP (…and your career too…).

Please refer to: http://meetingofideas.wordpress.com/2013/04/26/rop-return-on-project-the-humble-beginning-07/ for my first Post about ROP – a sort of introduction.

Today I talk about: “1) Over-convoluted project workflow (‘I hate bureaucracy! I hate overhead!’)”

Project workflow includes “gates”, approvals, signed documents, “filtering” procedures, due-diligence, etc. Many of these steps are absolutely useful and valuable, others sadly are just worthless bureaucracy. The goal here is to find a good and very well balanced trade-off between overhead (that is, cost) and added value.

Remember, the project workflow does not make any direct transformation to the product/service that the customer is willing to pay for (the outcome of your project); it just manages the creation process.

Each time a step is performed/enforced, a cost is incurred, and there is also a significant risk of delaying delivery: it’s therefore vital to scrutinise the project workflow to eliminate unnecessary governance activities.

In my next six Posts about ROP, I will talk about the other six causes of wasted resources during the life-cycle of a project:

2) Too many ‘Not-yet-in-Production’ (that is, not yet ‘usable’) COMPLETED features

3) Uncontrolled piling up of new feature-requests (“…doesn’t it remind you of a bad game of TETRIS?”)

4) Project workflow bottlenecks (“Hurry up, Andy!! I’ve got five people waiting for your deliverable!!”)

5) Implementation over-complication (“‘Simple’ and ‘elegant’ is most often than not better than ‘fancy’ and ‘sophisticated’”)

6) Bad ‘feature-implementation’ prioritization (“Who cares that we can back-up our DB? We don’t have a DB yet…!”)

7) Bug-proliferation (“What does HTTP500 mean?”)

Follow me not to miss them: don’t hesitate to subscribe to my blog [http://meetingofideas.wordpress.com] – don’t worry: no spam!

Andy Cavallini – Business Analyst & Project Manager

Gaia-Matrix_anim_small2

[English] ROP (Return On Project), the humble beginning… [0/7]

ROP - the BeginningLet’s talk about ROP (Return On Project), a ‘Project Management & Business analysis’ concept I am working on; ROP is all about efficiency and effectiveness: if the goal of your project is attained without wasting resources (…I think of time & money, of course…), then ROP is very high – don’t worry, we will work later on a significant measure for ROP…

A low ROP means angry project stakeholders, due to (…typically…) over-time (“We are late!!!”), over-budget (“Lower margins!?!”), low-quality (dysfunctional UX-User experience, bugs, low performance, disappointed users, etc.).

On the contrary, a high ROP makes your Clients smile, improves your company P&L and helps your ‘Project Management & Business analysis’ career take off (…interested…?).

Please note: ROP is strictly related to the ‘success’ of your building activities, not to the ‘success’ of what you built; in other words, if your team did a great job creating a product (or a service), the Return On Project is very high even if the product (or service) actually is useless and a failure from a business point of view.

My ‘original’ idea: if we categorize the most common causes of wasted resources in the life-cycle of a project, we will be able to reduce them and consequently improve ROP (…and your career, as I told you before…).

Here is my priceless list of the most significant wastes that affect – more or less – any project (…yes, I confess, I was somewhat inspired by the philosophy behind TPS-Toyota Production System…):

1) Over-convoluted project workflow (“I hate burocracy! I hate overhead!”)

2) Too many ‘Not-yet-in-Production’ (that is, not yet ‘usable’) COMPLETED features

3) Uncontrolled piling up of new feature-requests (“…doesn’t it remind you of a bad game of TETRIS?”)

4) Project workflow bottlenecks (“Hurry up, Andy!! I’ve got five people waiting for your deliverable!!”)

5) Implementation over-complication (“‘Simple’ and ‘elegant’ is most often than not better than ‘fancy’ and ‘sophisticated’”)

6) Bad ‘feature-implementation’ prioritization (“Who cares that we can back-up our DB? We don’t have a DB yet…!”)

7) Bug-proliferation (“What does HTTP500 mean?”)

In my next seven Posts, I will talk about each one, so please be patient and follow me – don’t hesitate to subscribe to my blog [http://meetingofideas.wordpress.com] to receive them in your inbox.

One more thing: your feedback is very appreciated!

Many thanks,

Andy Cavallini – Business Analyst & Project Manager

Gaia-Matrix_anim_small2

[english] Manage projects and activities: reduce context-switches, save time and be happy…

InterruptionsBuongiorno a tutti, ecco un altro mio Post in versione inglese – spero vi possa interessare – ho già affrontato questo argomento un po’ di tempo fa…

By the way, ho appena aggiornato il mio profilo su LinkedIn, dategli pure un’occhiata: http://it.linkedin.com/in/andycavallini

[Please visit my blog http://meetingofideas.wordpress.com for additional content about Project Management and the Digital World]

Am I dreaming? I am not sure…

Looking around, I see the open-space where I used to work several years ago – I was junior, wasn’t I? – and in front of me there is a desk and a PC, with Windows XP!

God…

My Calendar says that in a few minutes I am attending a meeting scheduled by my fantastic boss. Since I’m not looking for troubles, I promptly reach the meeting-place -it’s an office just a short walk from my open-space.

I find… Continua a leggere

“Meeting delle Idee” & “Meeting of ideas”…

MeetingofideasCiao, come qualcuno di voi saprà, questo blog ha un fratello “internazionale” in english (Meeting of Ideas), nato qualche tempo fa con il moltiplicarsi dei miei contatti professionali all’estero.

Lo trovate all’indirizzo: http://meetingofideas.wordpress.com, fateci un giro e ditemi cosa ne pensate, vi va? Ma rimanete fedeli al Meeting delle Idee (http://meetingdelleidee.wordpress.com alias http://www.gaia-matrix.com).

Ancora meglio, fate un po’ di pubblicità a http://meetingofideas.wordpress.com e parlatene ai Vs. amici, parenti, colleghi sparsi per il mondo – grazie in anticipo!

Su http://meetingofideas.wordpress.com ho appena pubblicato la versione in inglese di un Post che avevo pubblicato qui in italiano a gennaio: http://meetingdelleidee.wordpress.com/2013/01/17/il-pre-progetto-il-progetto-ed-il-post-progetto/

Grazie per l’attenzione e continuate a seguire http://meetingdelleidee.wordpress.com alias http://www.gaia-matrix.com, ci saranno parecchie novità a breve…

Andy Cavallini (andy.cavallini@tin.it)

Gaia-Matrix_anim_small2